ATE regulation plea over 'speccing' time-bomb

The after the event (ATE) insurance sector has highlighted a problem area that has serious implications for both brokers and insurers.

It is claimed that the issue of 'speccing' - when a solicitor fails to insure the outcome of a personal-injury case taken on a conditional fee agreement (CFA) because they are confident of the outcome - is undermining the already fragile ATE market.

Peter Dobie, underwriting manager at Allianz Cornhill, said he believed speccing was opening up both the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected].

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: