FCA must remember that mud sticks

Andrew Pearce

This week the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) confirmed it now has the power to publically name firms under investigation.

The watchdog said it would make the information public through a warning notice statement that will "usually" name the firm under investigation. It even went as far to say that "in certain circumstances" it would name individuals. 

Although the move has been in the offing for a while the announcement still sparked a heated response.

One reader posted the question on this site ‘Guilty until proven innocent?' while a few hours later law firm CMS Cameron McKenna went as far to query FCA's motives

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

Meet the MGA feature: Arc Legal 

Arc Legal CEO Lee Taylor outlines the value in having a supportive parent of the scale of AmTrust; and why it makes sense to keep an eye on legislation and social changes in order to innovate and develop new products.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: