In-depth - schemes: Knowledge is power

knowledge is power

There are opportunites for brokers in schemes if new ideas are backed up by knowledge in the sector, writes Rachel Gordon. Three case studies compiled by Siân Barton also detail how to succeed with new, mid-age and veteran schemes

Case studies
The veteran scheme

Scheme: Cliverton, Lycetts

Age: 40+

Line of business: Animal traders (for those, not including vets, who work with animals)

Underwriter: Lloyd’s capacity

Policyholders: 16,500

GWP: £4m

Andrew Ball, divisional director – Cliverton, Lycetts:

“The Cliverton scheme has been running for over 40 years. It was originally set up by Cliverton Insurance Brokers. Lycetts bought the business in 2003, that’s when we took on the scheme.

“The product is for animal

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

Meet the MGA feature: Arc Legal 

Arc Legal CEO Lee Taylor outlines the value in having a supportive parent of the scale of AmTrust; and why it makes sense to keep an eye on legislation and social changes in order to innovate and develop new products.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: