Stonegate BI judgement criticised for giving insurers potential furlough 'windfall'

Money

The High Court judgement in the Stonegate Pub Company vs MS Amlin & Others business interruption case has been criticised by a law firm for potentially offering insurance companies an unexpected ‘windfall’ by discounting furlough payments from claims.

Today’s judgement was handed down before the Right Honourable Justice Butcher in this case, alongside Greggs PLC v Zurich Insurance and Various Eateries Trading Ltd v Allianz Insurance, which both covered similar grounds.

David Pryce, managing partner at Fenchurch Law that acted on behalf of Stonegate, told Insurance Age: “If you are to look at the three key issues which were the subject of the Stonegate case in terms of their general applicability to policyholders are: aggregation, causation

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: