Skip to main content

Help the aged

Q. I was looking into employing an older segment of the workforce that could provide invaluable broker experience to my business. Would it be wise to provide technical training to these employees and what are the implications of employing an individual of an older age? Which body legally protects the treatment of older employees?

Older employees are more often than not the first to be made redundant and the last to be hired for a new job. In the world of work and business, they are routinely discriminated against. Though they can bring invaluable experience and expertise to a position, they are often cast aside if they are over 50 years of age and, in some industries/posts, over 35 years is thought of as 'too old'.

Many employers consider that employees approaching their older years either do not need further development, or that they are incapable of responding. Older employees often consider they are incapable of learning or adapting to new roles. Potential employers also perceive older staff to feel frightened of returning to a learning environment.

However, these perceptions are unfounded and can be changed if an employer goes about it properly, explaining that training is a requirement of the position.

Currently, workers close to retirement age can see their redundancy payments reduced in their 64th year and they lose the right to claim unfair dismissal at age 65 (earlier in some cases). This lack of protection of older workers has been an unfair but ongoing process in the work environment.

A change in the law to address this issue is due to take effect in October 2006. This law will ban age discrimination (young and old) and there is unlikely to be a compulsory state retirement age.

The various commissions, dealing with discrimination in all its guises, are to be brought under one umbrella in the future. And, as it will be an independent body, it will be free from government control and able to combat discrimination affecting older and younger workers. This power will extend to enforcing new laws that can punish employers for discrimination in recruitment in the future.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.insuranceage.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Q&A: Grove & Dean’s Michael Lawrence

Michael Lawrence, distribution and underwriting director at personal lines specialist Grove & Dean, spent 34 years at LV general insurance in its various guises before jumping the fence in 2024.

End of Year Review 2025: Axa Retail’s Matt Field

Matt Field, intermediary director at Axa Retail, hails the insurer’s domestic violence proposition; keeps a keen eye on its NPS; and predicts new entrants to shake up the retail personal lines market, with a particular focus on data and technology.

End of Year Review 2025: Allianz Personal’s Graham Wright

Graham Wright, managing director – broker (interim) at Allianz Personal, acknowledges customers have benefited from the soft market, muses about whether consolidation has suppressed new entrants and keeps his cards close to his chest over the insurer’s plans for 2026.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: