Skip to main content

Indecent electronic proposals

Obtaining quotations and applying for insurance online or via other electronic processes can lead to misinterpretation or misrepresentation of a client's needs and personal details

The Court of Appeal has again emphasised - in the recent case of Whitlam v. Hazel - the importance of brokers making sure that questions in proposal forms are answered accurately and completely.

The claimant, Mr Whitlam, applied for motor insurance. He was working full-time at a sports shop connected with a golf course. He had applied to train as a golf professional and played in amateur tournaments in his own time.

He gave his broker a hand-written proposal form, in which he described his occupation as "shop assistant, retail" and gave his employer and business address as "Neil Burke - Horsham Golf + Fitness, Worthing Road".

The broker produced a printed form, which Whitlam signed. An electronic version of the form was then entered into a computer using ABI software to obtain a quotation. The form described Whitlam's occupation as "shop assistant, retailing", but merely gave the employer and business address as "Worthing Road, Horsham".

The broker omitted the reference to golf. The court said this was "most unfortunate".

Whitlam suffered a serious car accident when returning from a residential golf-training course that had been held at the Professional Golf Association's premises.

The Court of Appeal decided that Whitlam's motor insurers, KGM Motor Policies at Lloyd's, were entitled to avoid his policy because he had provided an incomplete and misleading answer to the questions about his occupation and his employer's name and address. He should have described himself as a "trainee golf professional" and the Court accepted the insurers' evidence that they would have rejected his proposal if they had known that this was his occupation. The question in the proposal form was not limited to paid employment. That he did not deliberately mislead the insurers was deemed irrelevant.

The Court was careful not to express an opinion on whether Whitlam had a claim against his broker, who was not a party to the proceedings. However, the case illustrates the dangers created if a broker makes alterations to answers when producing a form in order to obtain a quotation by computer.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.insuranceage.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Q&A: Grove & Dean’s Michael Lawrence

Michael Lawrence, distribution and underwriting director at personal lines specialist Grove & Dean, spent 34 years at LV general insurance in its various guises before jumping the fence in 2024.

End of Year Review 2025: Axa Retail’s Matt Field

Matt Field, intermediary director at Axa Retail, hails the insurer’s domestic violence proposition; keeps a keen eye on its NPS; and predicts new entrants to shake up the retail personal lines market, with a particular focus on data and technology.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: