Risk perspectives - Deterrence is not prevention but it helps

Insurance is no substitute for adequate security measures because without them, premises may not be ...

Insurance is no substitute for adequate security measures because without them, premises may not be insurable against theft. However, the amount a company invests in security varies, depending on the size of the risk, the likelihood of loss and the severity of the loss.

The most cost-effective physical security measures are deemed suitable, following a full risk assessment. An effective assessment will consider the likelihood of theft and its potential severity, such as the appeal of the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

This address will be used to create your account

The growing role for brokers in fighting insurance fraud

With reports of fraud escalating in terms of value or number, the role of brokers in combatting these crimes should not be underestimated. Edward Murray looks at the controls, validation tools and processes being implemented to support both detection and prevention.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: