Further to proven innocence.

I refer to the correspondence of A Moore of TG Webster (Innocent until proven guilty? Professional B...

I refer to the correspondence of A Moore of TG Webster (Innocent
until proven guilty? Professional Broking November 2001). The points
raised in Mr Moore's letter are very pertinent and, as I see it, there are
two areas that immediately spring to mind.


Firstly, is the issue of whether or not the client realises that, even
while a prosecution is pending, it is (or may) still be a material fact
that should be disclosed to an insurer.


Secondly, as almost all quotations these days are produced using
comp

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

This address will be used to create your account

The growing role for brokers in fighting insurance fraud

With reports of fraud escalating in terms of value or number, the role of brokers in combatting these crimes should not be underestimated. Edward Murray looks at the controls, validation tools and processes being implemented to support both detection and prevention.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: