Apportioning liability
Paul Castellani assesses the implications of Dunlop Hayward v Barbon for producing and placing brokers
In some markets, there will be more than one broker involved in distribution: a producing broker interacting with the client and a placing broker interacting with insurers to place the risk. Each owes similar, though not identical, duties. The producing broker owes duties to the insured while the placing broker owes them to the producing broker.
What happens where the insured does not receive the cover it intended or, worse still, insurers are entitled to decline cover? Is liability split
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@insuranceage.co.uk
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@insuranceage.co.uk
Most read
- Wakam receives PRA approval for new £500m GWP UK insurer
- Aviva’s David Martin on the art of the possible
- Brokers push for more from RSA/NIG