Skip to main content

Brokers warn insurers: shape up

A study of commercial insurers' service to UK brokers has shown large-scale dissatisfaction with the big players, writes Peter Joy.

In a report by Insurance 360 - a research unit established by PB's publisher, Incisive Media - intermediaries graded insurers on seven aspects of service. Their feedback showed frustration - as ever - with poorly-staffed and badly-managed call-centres. The seven largest insurers in our study were all identified as serious offenders in this area.

Time wasted hanging on the telephone caused much resentment, especially when the staff member picking up the call has to refer it onwards. The trouble is that, for small package business in particular, direct telephone access to trained people is uneconomic; yet even small and medium-sized enterprise risks routinely defy insurers' efforts at pigeonholing.

 

Shining example

The insurers that fared best were those working hard to produce slick, broker-centric online systems for low-premium business, freeing more highly skilled people to take care of business for which human judgement is indispensable. MMA's Broker Online and Evergreen's Stage 2 systems were popular with brokers and highly successful.

There is nothing new here. What has improved is the execution and delivery. To do their jobs, such systems need to be broker-friendly and have top-notch technical and underwriter support on tap; it is no help to dismiss phone enquiries with responses like 'you should get that from our website'. Many large insurers have failed in this way. Technology is proving a powerful leveller and, in smaller-premium commercial business, more manoeuvrable players are seizing its opportunities.

The hardening market is also revealing a shortage of trained underwriters. Allianz and AIG were considered passable in this respect; the best performers were largely old-school specialists such as Northern Marine Underwriters, Beazley, Chubb, Catlin and Hiscox: the underwriters of these companies knew their products and sectors inside out.

Another revelation was the rise of online documentation systems. A year ago, many brokers moaned about them and the reams of expensive printing. Now, we've passed a watershed: insurers' online documentation has improved and brokers have shifted towards paperless processes.

Several newer insurers and managing general agents - such as Evergreen, Arista and LV - have practically built their companies around frictionless, instant documentation that is designed to be short, clear and e-mail- and client-friendly. It is no accident that brokers rated these three as the top performers for documents being timely and usable.

Other insurers are still in transition, leading to marked contrasts in satisfaction between the brokers using their online documents and those lumbered with the contents of heavyweight manila envelopes. Some insurers, however, such as Axa, Aviva, RSA and AIG, remain bogged down in legacy issues where documentation is concerned and so risk being left behind.

Big composites are struggling with renewals, too: the bottom quartile included all seven of the largest insurers. Bureaucratic inefficiency was one cause with another the tendency to demand universal rate rises. At smaller mono-line markets, management was closer to its underwriters and more willing to trust their commercial feel for what clients would bear.

Concerning products, newer, more focused, compact insurers are performing far better. They are supplying specialist products carefully designed and continually updated to match the real needs of today's clients.

 

Outsourcing woe

In claims, as ever, shambling admin, poor call centres, apathetic staff and rejection quotas were giving brokers headaches. Straitened insurers are outsourcing more work to external contractors but few are managing the process competently.

AIG and Arista were poor performers on claims with weak contractor management a prime cause. Outsourcing can work well but insurers have to pick their suppliers carefully and put tight systems in place to make sure that they deliver.

Half of the 40 most-used insurers in the commercial broker market are underperforming on some, most or all aspects of their services. Clients have a choice, though. High-performance start-ups, competent mid-sized insurers and skilled mono-line specialists are competing in every line of commercial business. The podgiest composites would be advised to start a fitness programme.

• To purchase a copy of the report, entitled The Business Insurers Insight Study, e-mail peter.joy@incisivemedia.com.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.insuranceage.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

End of Year Review 2025: Axa Retail’s Matt Field

Matt Field, intermediary director at Axa Retail, hails the insurer’s domestic violence proposition; keeps a keen eye on its NPS; and predicts new entrants to shake up the retail personal lines market, with a particular focus on data and technology.

End of Year Review 2025: Bspoke’s Craig Morgan

Craig Morgan, managing director of Bspoke Sports & Leisure, echoes the concerns of others over the speed the market has softened; hails the work of Ajay Mistry in championing transparency and diversity; and shares a giant darts nickname.

End of Year Review 2025: Allianz Personal’s Graham Wright

Graham Wright, managing director – broker (interim) at Allianz Personal, acknowledges customers have benefited from the soft market, muses about whether consolidation has suppressed new entrants and keeps his cards close to his chest over the insurer’s plans for 2026.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: