Insurer QC accuses FCA of "hair splitting wordsmithery” as Supreme Court showdown continues

Supreme Court

Insurers and the regulator set out their starkly differing views on the use of trends clauses on day two of the ongoing business interruption test case hearing at the Supreme Court.

David Turner QC, representing RSA, opened the day by wrapping up his submission regarding its Cottagesure policy – RSA1 – which he had started the previous day before turning to RSA3 – also known as Eaton Gate Commercial Combined.

The provider had opted against appealing the High Court’s ruling on two other policies including the Marsh/Jelf Resilience wording.

Turner maintained a focus on radius, which had been prominent across the first day’s proceedings when QBE, Argenta and MS Amlin had

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: