Action group brands insurers' focus on lack of specific pandemic cover 'a diversionary tactic'

online-court

Insurers’ repeated argument that policies were not intended to cover pandemics has been described as “a diversionary tactic” on the third day of the Financial Conduct Authority’s business interruption test case.

Philip Edey QC, who is representing the Hospitality Insurance Group Action, made the comment as he argued that notifiable disease clauses within QBE and RSA policies respond to coronavirus pandemic.

The HIGA is one of two claimant action groups that successfully applied to participate in the hearing, the other being the Hiscox Action Group, from whom the court is expected to hear tomorrow.

“Focusing, as insurers are wont to do, on the word ‘pandemic’, as if it is some magical thing wholly

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: