FCA turns focus to policy intention in Covid-19 BI battle

Scales

The regulator's particulars of claim for the test case stated that the defendants’ reasons for wordings are not relevant or admissible.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) particulars of claim (PoC) attacks the argument posed by some providers that their policies were never intended to pay out for pandemics.

In the particulars of claim for the approaching test case on the issue the watchdog argued: “The Defendants’ subjective intentions (or their reasons behind the design of the Wordings) is not relevant or admissible.”

It added: “This is particularly the case given that these policies are offered by the Defendants in a

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

This address will be used to create your account

Broking profits fall at Saga

Underlying profit before tax in Saga’s insurance broking arm fell to £39.8m for the year ended 31 January 2024, compared with £71.5m in the previous period.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: