Skip to main content

There is change afoot but who is driving it?

Robin Oakes looks at the changes undergone by the London insurance market over the past 24 years and says it is time the regulator caught up if the market is to become the world's best

Although it is often perceived as staunchly traditional and resistant to change, the insurance industry has undergone major changes in the last 24 years. At times, this constant change has seemed to threaten the market's future, or at the very least, hinder the market's ability to operate during this period, it has been change that has saved it from near disaster.

However, more change is still needed, including faster and more certain business processing, greater transparency and tailored

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.insuranceage.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Why The Mills Review is the AI starting pistol for brokers

Most coverage of The Mills Review, published on 6 July, has focused on what it does not do. There is no new AI rulebook, no new obligations and nothing specific to implement. But that somewhat misses the point, writes Robin Knowles, compliance consultant at UKGI.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: