High Court rules against Marshmallow on Toba breaches and confidential information misuse in Mulsanne case

high-court-pa

The judge has not ruled on compensation with this case focused solely on liability.

Marshmallow breached its obligations under a terms of business agreement with Mulsanne and misused Mulsanne’s confidential information in preparation to launch its own insurance company in January 2021, the High Court has ruled.

The dispute between insurer Mulsanne and its former broker Marshmallow and the latter’s own insurer was heard by Sir Anthony Mann over 13 days in November and December last year, following the breakdown in the relationship between the firms earlier in 2021.

Having

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: