A step too far?

Q. It has been pointed out that my firm needs to have some sort of business continuity plan as part of our Financial Services Authority compliance. Surely this is not a regulatory matter, just another needless example of over-zealous regulating?

Demonstrating to the regulator that you have given some thought to the hazards that face your business is more of a regulatory matter than you may think.

Remember that the Financial Services Authority's approach to regulation is driven by its four core objectives laid down by the Treasury, and these include protection of the public.

What confidence can the regulator (or indeed your clients) have in your business, if you do not have a plan in place to deal with any threats to the existence of the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: