Skip to main content

Adjusting for goodwill

Accountant Jessica Wills analyses the latest financial statements for 45 of the top 50 firms according to IMAS to see if a change in the way broking firms account for goodwill and intangible assets would have a significant impact

Since changes were implemented at the beginning of the year by the Financial Services Authority, accounting for goodwill has been a hot topic in the insurance broking sector. Under UK GAAP, Financial Reporting Standard No. 10 states that goodwill and other intangible assets should be recognised as an asset on the balance sheet and amortised on a systematic basis over their useful economic life. There is a rebuttable assumption that 'useful economic life' is limited to 20 years or less; most firms included in this review operate under UK GAAP.

Under International Financial Reporting Standards, IFRS No. 3 and International Accounting Standard No. 38 state that goodwill and other intangible assets should be recognised as an asset on the balance sheet and reviewed annually for impairment, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it might be impaired. Only seven of the firms reviewed have adopted IFRS.

Our review demonstrates that, in the top 50 firms, there are significant intangible assets that are predominantly goodwill.

A balance-sheet analysis of the intangible-to-net asset ratio indicates that the market is highly sensitive to accounting policies adopted in respect of intangible asset recognition, amortisation and impairment. This is not surprising when 81% of the net assets of the 45 firms reviewed are goodwill. The market trend of consolidation, the increase in acquisition multiples and the fact that much consolidation activity is funded by debt are key factors in driving this ratio of intangible and net assets.

Worryingly, our sensitivity analysis shows that:

- Six firms have net liabilities if intangible assets are removed from the balance sheet.

- One firm would turn from profit to loss if the amortisation period were reduced from 20 to 10 years.

- Three firms would halve their profits if the amortisation period were reduced from 20 to 10 years.

This analysis raises the question of whether or not firms would benefit from a change to IFRS, where intangible assets are subject to annual impairment review rather than an annual amortisation, with such a change potentially improving future profits for some firms by a significant margin.

Jessica Wills, audit manager, financial services division, Littlejohn.

TOP BROKERS: BALANCE-SHEET ANALYSIS UK GAAP IFRS TotalNumber of firms with intangible assets 27 5 32Goodwill £1,103m £329m £1,432mTotal intangible assets £1,107m £382m £1,489mNet assets £1,343m £491m £1,834mTotal intangible assets as percentage net assets 82% 78% 81%

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.insuranceage.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

FCA warns on fake letters

The Financial Conduct Authority has warned of fake letters claiming to be from deputy CEO Sarah Pritchard and referencing a fake FCA employee.

FCA proposes 1.4% fee rise for broker block

The Financial Conduct Authority is consulting on raising levies from brokers by 1.4% in 2026/27 – double its annual budget increase – as it also laid out its work programme going into the second year of its five-year strategy.

ManyPets confirms social media clone

Pet insurance managing general agent ManyPets has confirmed a customer was contacted by an X account impersonating its brand and has issued a warning on how increasingly convincing scammers can appear.

Aviva responds to Direct Line’s £10.6m fine

Aviva has confirmed it was fully aware of the ‘historical’ accounting errors that have led to the Prudent Regulation Authority hitting Direct Line Group with a £10.6m fine and stated there will be no impact on the integration or the financial benefits it expects from the takeover.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: