Skip to main content

Towergate consolidation drive heats up

Towergate shows no signs of letting up on its consolidation drive, with plans to acquire broking fir...

Towergate shows no signs of letting up on its consolidation drive, with plans to acquire broking firms struggling to meet the new solvency requirements in January 2008.

The confirmation comes against a backdrop of results that indicate the consolidator is in rugged health. Sales in 2006 nudged past the £1bn mark, after it was revealed that on an annualised basis, Towergate now manages client policy premiums in excess of £1.5bn across the extended group of companies.

The most significant result was

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.insuranceage.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

Show password
Hide password

Blog: Is an AR boom incoming?

As the number of independent brokers reduces year on year, is the appointed representative model the way forward to bolster competition in the market following years of consolidation? Rosie Simms ponders the question.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: