Skip to main content

Novae nets profit in "defining year"

The Novae Group announced a profit of £32.8m for 2006, following a £17.9m loss in 2005. The combined...

The Novae Group announced a profit of £32.8m for 2006, following a £17.9m loss in 2005. The combined ratio improved dramatically from 104.6% to 81.4%. Chairman Paul Selway-Swift of Novae said: "During 2006 the rating environment clearly softened in a number of classes, particularly in UK commercial and liability lines, but this is from very high levels, so the immediate outlook remains encouraging.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.insuranceage.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

Show password
Hide password

What does the 2025 Budget mean for insurance brokers?

On Wednesday afternoon, after weeks of speculation (and an unprecedented early leak by the Office for Budget Responsibility), the Chancellor finally revealed her second Budget. Tom Golding, PKF Littlejohn partner considers some of the main tax changes and what these may mean for insurance brokers.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: