Opinion: Editor's comment - July 2010

Martin Friel

Have you received your letter, the one that informs you that your Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) bill has gone up a bit? "A bit?" I hear you cry. And cry you might for brokers are reporting increases of up to 800%.

This is not to say the FSCS should not be levying to provide compensation for customers who have no other recourse to compensation. Of course they should but the levies should be dished out proportionately. It is widely accepted that the main reason for the scale of this year's £61m levy on the sector is to make up for the mass mis-selling of payment protection insurance, mainly by the banking sector. So why then should brokers be held responsible for the cavalier trading of the banks?

Is it not

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

This address will be used to create your account

FCA adds four more S166s to sector

The Financial Conduct Authority has slapped the general insurance and protection sector with another four skilled person reports as the crackdown continues.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: