Clouded judgement - Insurance Age

Graham Laing is the marketing manager of Motassist and project director of One Click Legal
01 Oct 2006

Tweet
Facebook
LinkedIn
Save this article
Send to
Print this page

Brokers still regard legal expenses insurance as something of a sham, and for many years, and for various reasons, they have opted for non-underwritten claims products and non-fault referral schemes.

But do brokers recognise the truth behind the years of commercially clouded advice being provided by lawyers and claims managers? Why are brokers still promoting non-underwritten cover and after-the-event referral schemes? Do they recognise the risk with the alternatives to promoting a legitimate

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected].

You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]

You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]

To continue reading...

Sign In

Access Insurance Age

You are currently on corporate access.