Marsh bites back as RSA alleges it is on the hook for wording in FCA BI test case

businessmen-fighting

Insurers hit back at claims they were liable to pay out on BI policies in defense documents filed on Tuesday 23 June, all arguing that policies were never meant to pay out for global events.

Arguing on behalf of policyholders, the FCA has said if necessary it will rely on the contra proferentem argument, also known as ‘interpretation against the draftsman’, which it says means the defendants’ subjective intentions are “neither relevant or admissible”.

RSA has four wordings under scrutiny

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected].

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: