Skip to main content

Lost in translation

Having read the Indian outsourcing article (PB, January 2005) with interest, I asked three of my sta...

Having read the Indian outsourcing article (PB, January 2005) with interest, I asked three of my staff to also read the article and provide me with their opinions.

These opinions contrasted markedly with those expressed in the article, especially on the claims side. It was felt that the diction from the ladies was reasonable, but it can be very difficult to understand what the men are saying and there is generally little confidence in what the majority were telling us.

In our opinion, their major problem lies in the fact that the vocabulary is insufficient and that they encounter problems with our accents even though they are not 'broad' ones. We tend to have to use our own knowledge/experience to lead them to the correct answer.

I think the insurance companies need to get feedback from broker staff who have to put up with call centres rather than listen to opinions from senior management at insurers' or brokers' offices. My staff will objectively provide direct feedback if asked.

Chris Fort, Partner, Harry Fort Insurance Brokers.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.insuranceage.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

FCA proposes 1.4% fee rise for broker block

The Financial Conduct Authority is consulting on raising levies from brokers by 1.4% in 2026/27 – double its annual budget increase – as it also laid out its work programme going into the second year of its five-year strategy.

ManyPets confirms social media clone

Pet insurance managing general agent ManyPets has confirmed a customer was contacted by an X account impersonating its brand and has issued a warning on how increasingly convincing scammers can appear.

Aviva responds to Direct Line’s £10.6m fine

Aviva has confirmed it was fully aware of the ‘historical’ accounting errors that have led to the Prudent Regulation Authority hitting Direct Line Group with a £10.6m fine and stated there will be no impact on the integration or the financial benefits it expects from the takeover.

PRA fines Direct Line underwriter £10.6m

The Prudential Regulation Authority has fined UK Insurance Limited, a subsidiary and principal underwriter of Direct Line Group and now part of Aviva, £10.625m for a miscalculation of its Solvency II balance sheet during 2023 and 2024.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: