Case Study - ... or coolly assessed?

The assignment: in a classic assessor-versus-adjuster head-to-head, Barry Whyte and Jonathan Samuelson are challenged to untangle a claim for business interruption that dragged on for months and cost nearly £500,000

The loss assessor's view

To assess the extent to which these claims might be met is not straightforward, given the lack of information in some key areas. Accordingly, I have had to make a number of assumptions:

- That the loss arose from an insured peril. If it was a mechanical breakdown, it is likely that the all-risks material damage policy would not cover the loss.

- That there is no seasonal bias in turnover.

- That the business was operating at full capacity.

- That there is no trend in the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

This address will be used to create your account

FCA adds four more S166s to sector

The Financial Conduct Authority has slapped the general insurance and protection sector with another four skilled person reports as the crackdown continues.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: