Claims firm shut down and stung with fine following organised fraud

Liz McMahon
07 Apr 2011

Tweet
Facebook
LinkedIn
Save this article
Send to
Print this page

A judge has slammed claims made against Chartis Insurance UK arising from a seemingly genuine road accident as fraudulent, leaving the conspirators liable for over £20,000 in legal costs.

The case of Saleem v Usman and Chartis Insurance UK was heard at Bradford County Court in December 2010 and the investigation into the claims was handled by Barlow Lyde & Gilbert (BLG) on behalf of client Chartis Insurance UK.

In the case, Mr Saleem and Mr Usman maintained that they were involved in an accident

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected].

You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]

You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]

To continue reading...

Sign In

Access Insurance Age

You are currently on corporate access.