Insurance Rage: Twambley grills Williams over whiplash

Insurance Rage Episode 4

The inaugural series concludes with A2J’s Andrew Twambley challenging Axa Insurance’s David Williams about his views on the Civil Liability Bill.

Twambley alleges that Williams has no evidence to back up his claims on fraud. How does Axa’s technical director respond to the accusation that legal rights are being thrown under the bus?

“That’s the biggest joke I’ve ever, ever heard in my whole life” – just what does Williams say to provoke this reaction from Twambley?

The concluding head-to-head debate follows on from the start of the new Insurance Rage video series designed to allow experts to speak directly to camera and expound their

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

This address will be used to create your account

Market Movement Index: should I stay or should I go?

New research from analyst Broker Insights shows there is plenty of commercial policy movement – particularly in lower premium classes – which indicates strong competition and adequate capacity. But do brokers agree? Rachel Gordon reports.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: