Skip to main content

Polaris prepares for patent showdown

The legal spat between brokers, insurers and the owner of the multi-million pound patent for online ...

The legal spat between brokers, insurers and the owner of the multi-million pound patent for online comparative facilities is set to come to a head, with Polaris on the verge of going to court.

The owner of a patent for online comparative facilities claimed that imarket, the electronic trading portal headed up by Polaris, has infringed the patent's original design.

The patent, which has been valued at between £17.2 and £22.5m relates to online updating of data which facilitates price comparisons

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.insuranceage.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

Show password
Hide password

AIG adds Clifford after Neal U-turn

American International Group has appointed Adam Clifford as CEO of international commercial insurance as he rejoins the insurer in the latest leadership development since the recruitment of John Neal was called off.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: