Skip to main content

Regulator costs soar by 24%

Revolving door

New regulators must demonstrate more value for money, says NAO.

The cost of running two regulators - the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) - is 24% higher than for the Financial Services Authority (FSA), according to a report by the National Audit Office (NAO).

In its Regulating Financial Services the NAO put the projected combined costs for 2013/2014 at £664m, some £127m higher than the 2012/2013 cost of the FSA.

However, the auditor added that "these increased costs are set in the context of the potential

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.insuranceage.co.uk/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Meet the MGA: Lumara

Having helped set-up one MGA in Arista two decades ago, Lumara CEO David Aslin explains why he is going again, seeking to be a top three partner with its brokers through a combination of expertise, flexible products and agency exclusivity.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: