Court rules for "collateral lie" gets mixed reaction

Judge's gavel

Industry warned fraud problem could grow after legal ruling.

The Supreme Court's ruling that insurers must still pay out on claims even when the claimant has lied has received a mixed reaction from industry leaders, with some arguing that this could push up the cost of insurance.

The ruling came after a dispute over damage to a Dutch cargo ship called DC Merwestone.

The Supreme Court held that the rule on fraudulent claims does not apply to a "collateral lie" which turns out when the true facts are revealed to have been immaterial to the assured's right

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: