Where am I? > Home > Stats

Management Statistics

PB Statistics





The stats

graph-p34-stats-0212

As this month's reportage shows, the theme of liability is a wide and varied one, incorporating a mixture of risks.

This month’s Keychoice statistics have measured the combination of public, product and employers’ liability for larger risks. It does not measure liability per capita for self-employed people, such as for plumbers or bricklayers, who would generate average premiums at the lower end of the premium scale for brokers.

Whereas the solicitors’ professional indemnity graph (Insurance Age, September 2011) had one natural peak in October for the simple reason that the renewal season occurs then, the combined liability graph – with its Toblerone-esque shape – is in truth a more curious entity.

Peaks in January, April and June could in theory be ascribed to financial year-ends but thereafter the reasons behind its shape are unclear.

February saw the biggest fall in average premiums of 5.6% on a year-by-year basis. Brokers will have been pleased that April was the only other month – albeit June and July came close to parity – to show any sign of market softening. They will perhaps have been even more pleased that following on instantly from February’s low, the market rebounded to its biggest gain of the year with a 19.2% gap between average premiums in March 2010 and March 2011.

The second half of 2011 will also have provided room for nascent optimism. July aside, each month saw stronger average premiums for what are likely to have been similar if not identical risks each year. However, even this burst of positivity appears to be in danger of being short lived. After strong double digit growth at the start of the third quarter, the increases have tailed away to the point where the year closed with average premiums up only 3.7%. The figure is less than basic inflation in the wider economy and thus it is unlikely brokers will be able to grow their business and highly unlikely for insurers to be covering claims inflation.

Those brokers involved in the market will surely be hoping that the start of 2012 will involve a return to the rate improvements seen last summer, rather than a repeat of the fall in February 2011.

ambestlogo

A.M. Best Company top 10 commercial lines financial loss insurers in the UK

 

 

 

Rank 2010

Rank 2009

AMB

Company name

Rating

Ultimate parent

GWP (£000s)

Underwriting result* (£000s)

Combined ratio (%)

Loss ratio (%)

1

1

87336

Euler Hermes UK

NR

Allianz SE

154,171

13,540

72.2

12.9

2

2

87416

Chartis Europe**

NR

American International Group

125,960

16,198

20.7

-1.5

3

4

86485

Ace European Group

A+

Ace

124,039

-7,780

119.9

77.9

4

6

84806

Aspen Insurance UK †

A

Aspen Insurance Holdings

98,518

N/A

N/A

N/A

5

7

87312

HCC International Insurance Company

NR

HCC Insurance Holdings

65,675

16,262

75

37.9

6

5

85630

Chubb Insurance Company of Europe SE

A++

The Chubb Corporation

55,003

-2,951

108.5

81.4

7

8

87425

Liberty Mutual Insurance Europe

A

Liberty Mutual Holding Company

49,186

6,202

N/A

N/A

8

3

87216

Ambac Assurance UK ††

NR

Ambac Financial Group

28,863

23,428

244.2

103.8

9

10

87466

Motors Insurance Company

NR

Ally Finacial

24,157

-3,888

80.6

78.9

10

11

86126

QBE Insurance (Europe)

A

QBE Insurance Group

23,469

-395

N/A

N/A

Note: Some ratio figures on an underwriting year basis, for which earned premiums is not disclosed on the FSA return. Figures in above table are based on FSA returns of financial year 2010 for commercial lines financial loss insurance business lines (reporting category 280)
* Underwriting result excludes investment income. **Chartis reported a decrease in claims incurred related to prior years large enough to produce an overall negative loss (claims) ratio – coupled with a large share of reinsurance commission, it lead to a lower than usual combined ratio. † Aspen Insurance UK did not report separate information on premiums and claims, so underwriting result and operating ratios are not available. †† Ambac’s large combined ratio is due to a negative discount on their claims causing a high loss ratio. The expense ratio is high due to (a) large loss of reinsurance commission and profit participation and (b) writing less business resulting in a lower net written premium.
Ratings as of January 9, 2012.

 

Stats archive

Stats - January 2012 | Stats - December 2011 | Stats - November 2011 | Stats - October 2011 | Stats - September 2011 | Stats - August 2011 | Stats - July 2011 | Stats - June 2011 | Stats - May 2011 | Stats - April 2011

IA_image

Read the latest edition of Insurance Age as a digital interactive e-book.


Dont miss out - register now to receive a FREE digital edition of Insurance Age every month

Advertisement

Advertisement

Latest white papers

ih-against-the-grain

Against the grain 2011: A series of guest articles from expert commentators

Designed to stimulate new ideas, fresh thinking and innovation in the motor claims market.

ih-grant-thornton

The new world for insurance: business perspectives on phase II

The issues driving domicile have become a topic of ongoing interest to the insurance industry. This is why we decided that it was a subject worthy of some closer investigation.

Services section

SUBSCRIPTIONS

Keep informed

Register here to apply for your complimentary subscription to Insurance Age, the leading magazine for the broking community.

EVENTS

Broker Expo 2011

Broker Expo is the annual event for the UK insurance industry, combining an exhibition showcasing almost 100 key companies with a programme of expert-led workshops to create the perfect business environment. The 2011 event will take place on 3rd November at the Ricoh Arena, Coventry.

SOCIAL MEDIA

Follow us on Twitter

Over 1600 users keep abreast of the latest industry news via regular tweets and discussions from the insuranceage.co.uk editorial teams on Twitter and LinkedIn. Follow the main twitter profiles, @insuranceage, @Brokingmartin, @brokingbod and @Brokingcait for opinion, viewpoints, live discussion tweets and links to articles.

DO QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS REDUCE RISK?

Risk reviews for PII Brokers

We help PII brokers to find out if their clients' quality management systems reduce risk. In our experience many don't, and certification to ISO 9001 is not a reliable indicator. We can help your clients to reduce bureaucracy and make controls more effective.
Contact: Ray Murphy on 0208 673 5740 email: info@enigmaqpm.com web: www.enigmaqpm.com

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertise here

InsuranceAge.co.uk is the only site dedicated to the UK broking community. To advertise your scheme, service or any upcoming events in this space to over 25,000 users viewing this page every month contact Chris Finnegan on 020 7316 9632.