Thoughts on the fairness of FOS investigations

- "Surely the charges should relate to who is at fault? Hence, if a claim is upheld the insurer pays...

- "Surely the charges should relate to who is at fault? Hence, if a claim is upheld the insurer pays, if not upheld the complainant pays"

- "Charges should only be applied when a complaint is upheld even if the charge is more expensive as a result. Customers are now far more aware of the FOS and now complain directly over any aspect of the service, even when decisions are FSA-compliant"

- "Flawed - as customers could cynically manipulate this to their advantage"

- "Totally unfair. It is the complainant who should be charged, with a refund given if they are successful"

- "It's early days to tell and the guidelines are not always specific enough in some of the cases"

- "Many of the charges result from criminal action and should not be passed to the rest of the market".

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

FCA adds four more S166s to sector

The Financial Conduct Authority has slapped the general insurance and protection sector with another four skilled person reports as the crackdown continues.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: